Monday, 19 September 2016

MUSEUM IS DEAD

                                               
Fortunately for last nearly 25 years, the museum movement in India has been gaining ground very fast. Besides the opening of new museums, in their outreach programmes, major ones among them stage conferences, seminars and discussions on important themes of museology, which by far creates much needed awareness in the public at large.  After all the public involvement is a challenge for the museum professionals. If the museum fails to attract the mass, it has failed in its mission, I think.
In this connection, in a lecture series, one programme was held at the local Habitat Centre on Sept. 17, 2016 on the theme entitled “The Dynamics of Culture Conservation: Institution Building Practices at BLD Museum and INTACH”. The prominent speakers were Jyotindra Jain, former Director, National Crafts Museum and Tasneen Zakaria Mehta of Dr. Bhau Daji Lad Mumbai City Museum. While delivering his lecture, Mr. Jain commented, “Museum is dead” which has baffled me. What did he mean? Has any new definition of museum been coined? We are not aware.
Since the covering newspaper report is laconic, one has to depend on his conjecture. We know that in the present age of technology and fast communications, the traditionally known areas of museum have been encroached upon. TV, Smart phone, internet, parks etc are attracting crowds which normally was in the museum kitty. Moreover, these media are in ones pocket to provide instant information. So who will spare a day to visit a museum? If the speaker referred to these, he was right, but only partly.
Like the above gadgets, the museum as such has also undergone a sea change. It is no more generally known ‘ajaibghar’. A couple of years back, the Museums Association of India, in its Patna annual conference had the theme of use of technology in museum. I remember that my presentation was entitled “Go Tech to save museum from wreck”. To cope with the changing situations, the museum field has also started adopting technology and diversifying its activities to embrace the common man. Moreover, since it has strongly been established over the years that the museum is also a centre for education, more and more writers, journalists, researchers and authors have jumped upon its bandwagon to explore this new and interesting subject.

In this light I feel that the museum is not dead. It is very much alive and kicking and will remain committed to the service of the community.