There is an old English saying : it is just not enough to be honest, one should at the same time also look to be so. This is possible only when the people at large are aware of your performance and to take it to the public, the role of publicity comes. There is one more similar maxim in the public, which says, publicise yourself and you will be popular. It has strongly caught the imagination of politicians worldwide today. Therefore, they prefer to dress immaculately, develop speaking power and arrange commandeered crowd in their public rallies. Publicity, today has assumed some cheap dimensions and so nobody would like to digest the epithet that he is publicizing himself. This led to the exploration of a better and more communicative euphemism and thus the most such popular word is known as marketing.
Today, the opposition in the Indian politics charges that Narendra Modi does little and projects more as he is adept at marketing. In the business world, marketing is a strong force and no producer can survive without giving an attractive look to the packaging of his product which once again is nothing but pure and simple marketing.
I donot think why somebody should be abhorrent of publicity as it is an established measure of taking your product or philosophy to the public. The word has suffered an erosion in its connotation because of its rampant misuse. When you give a catchy packaging to your inferior product, you are indirectly cheating the gullible customer. Now come to politics and apply this logic. The parties or their political leaders, when they utterly fail on the ground and try to make up through empty marketing/publicity, they are fleecing their constituency. Since this trend is gaining more and more currency, the word marketing has been losing its punch.
Today, the opposition in the Indian politics charges that Narendra Modi does little and projects more as he is adept at marketing. In the business world, marketing is a strong force and no producer can survive without giving an attractive look to the packaging of his product which once again is nothing but pure and simple marketing.
I donot think why somebody should be abhorrent of publicity as it is an established measure of taking your product or philosophy to the public. The word has suffered an erosion in its connotation because of its rampant misuse. When you give a catchy packaging to your inferior product, you are indirectly cheating the gullible customer. Now come to politics and apply this logic. The parties or their political leaders, when they utterly fail on the ground and try to make up through empty marketing/publicity, they are fleecing their constituency. Since this trend is gaining more and more currency, the word marketing has been losing its punch.