There could be no time more opportune than the present for the BJP Prime Ministerial prospect, Narendra Modi as two authentic books have just hit the stalls demolishing a thick mist being created by his known critics to malign him. The first book is “ Narendra Modi : A Political Biography” by a British author named Andy Marino. The 310-page book has been published by the Harper Collins. The second book entitled “Modi, Muslim and Media: Voices from Narendra Modi’s Gujarat”, is authored by Madhu Kishwar.
Marino, who came from England, studied in depth the available materials to arrive at a conclusion how and why he was targeted and made to be a communalist. He also had some personal interviews and occasions to interact on board of planes/choppers in transit. It is not possible to talk in detail in this brief post. He has mentioned that Modi was highly shocked over the Godhra riots and decided to resign. However the party leaders both in the state as well as in the centre, who were aware of two facts – Modi’s non-involvement and his excellent organizational qualities, convinced him to retrace his steps. At no juncture he found any solid proof challenging his innocence. Moreover he has indicated foreign hands to malign him for obvious reasons.
The second book, replete with authentic facts, figures and interviews is a masterpiece on the subject. Without touching development, law and order etc with which Modi is credited, I shall refer to only situations of the riot and the likely elements which aggravated the unfortunate issue. In the wake of Keshubhai’s ineffective governance and discontentment prevailing in the public, the Congress was over optimistic to return to power. To stem the rot, the party High command dispatched Modi to Ahmedabad in Oct 2001. Immediately after that as a bolt from the blue, the devastating earthquake struck district Bhuj. Modi rushed to the scene, camped there and showed an unprecedented organizational endeavour to provide relief and rehabilitate for the victims.
This example made Modi immediately a capable man of crisis. Even the minorities in Bhuj started veering round him. According to Ms Kishwar, a Congress leader, named Sareswala is on the record to have expressed that if this man continued as the CM, for a long time the future of Congress will be bleak.The Congress was demoralized as if lightning had struck it. To the misfortune of the state and happiness of such elements, Godhra incident occurred. The author has flatly alleged that this section of people encashed it as an effective handle to beat Modi, so that he could not stand up. Today his critics charge that modi delayed to call in the army so that the minorities could be taught a lesson. The fact, according to the author is, when the incident peaked on Feb 28, 2002 Modi took army help on the next day viz March 1, hardly twentyfour hours. On the other hand, the Assam CM had engaged army after four days and Rajib Gandhi after two days in 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
The author says that no politician has been so much intentionally chastised and subjected to a number of enquiries without any holding him guilty. Despite a clean chit from the SC is it pardonable still to call him a killer, enemy of minorities and divider of the society? What I feel, it is to the credit of Modi that even in a known riot prone Gujarat,there has been none for last 12 years. Such critics should express their right reaction on the Supreme Court’s adverse comment on Mar 26 holding the SP Govt in UP responsible for allowing the Muzaffarnagar riots to deteriorate.